Showing posts with label Health Insurance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Health Insurance. Show all posts

You Can Get Health Insurance Without A Lot Of Hassle - Life is uncertain


Life is uncertain. It’s one of the things that makes living great. On the other hand, it also makes it more than a little terrifying. Tomorrow, you could be lounging poolside or you could find yourself in a sudden car accident. When the unexpected happens, you want to be prepared. Health insurance is a big part of that.

Before applying for health insurance, check with the Medical Information Bureau to see if the have a file on you. This medical information is accessible to most major insurance companies. Make sure you do not have anything on your file that would compromise you getting a good deal on health insurance.

Find out what the laws are in your state as to how much and what kind of health insurance you must have. Every state has it’s own exceptions or exemptions, so it’s important to know that before you apply for health insurance. Often you will find this information on the local government’s website.

Before applying for health insurance, check with the Medical Information Bureau to see if the have a file on you. This medical information is accessible to most major insurance companies. Make sure you do not have anything on your file that would compromise you getting a good deal on health insurance.

Deducting your health insurance premiums on your taxes can help save you a lot of money. If you’re self-employed, you can deduct the cost of your premiums on your taxes. This reduces your adjusted gross income so that your tax liability will probably be lower. You can do this whether you itemize deductions or not.

If you fear being laid off from your job, you may consider enrolling in a plan with a low premium. Since the government program that offset much of the cost of COBRA has ended, continuing your insurance coverage in the event of a layoff would come entirely from your own pocket, which could prove very difficult if your premium is high.

Make a list of things that are important to you in your health insurance plan. If you currently love your doctors, make sure to sign up for a plan that covers their medical practice. Whatever your priorities are, it helps to be aware of them before applying for the health insurance to get exactly what you need.

Think about using an insurance broker. A broker can be invaluable when looking for health insurance. They will shop for the best rates, find the best company, and explain exactly what the plan means, You can find a suitable broker via naic.org or nahu.org. Both of these sites have a list of reputable brokers in your area.

As you can see from the good advice in this article, you do not have to be one of those people at risk for unmanageable medical bills due to lack of good health insurance. Start using these tips today, and you will be surprised at how easy it is to get the right protection.

GAO reports yield info you can use

Auto Insurance Quotes ~ GAO reports yield info you can use : Say what you want about health care reform, but as with many other pieces of legislation that have been passed during the country's recent economic hard times, we are getting some much-needed transparency on a number of personal finance issues.

The Government Accountability Office, the investigative arm of Congress, has been busy fulfilling the requirements of these laws. The legislation calls for reports on various concerns from credit and debit card fees to the advice that workers are getting about their 401(k) plans to application and coverage denial rates for private health insurance.

In fact, you might want to bookmark the GAO website (www.gao.gov) so you can periodically check what the agency has to say about these items that directly affect your finances.

Denials reversed

For example, let me refer you to a recent report on private health insurance denials, a study that was required following the enactment of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. That's the health care law that has been pejoratively nicknamed Obamacare.

Nonetheless, it's because of this law and the resulting GAO follow-up that we got a great piece of advice for people covered by private health insurance.

If you are denied coverage, file an appeal.

The GAO said the data it reviewed indicated health insurance coverage denials, if appealed, are frequently reversed in the consumer's favor.

In looking at data available from four states, the GAO found that 39 percent to 59 percent of appeals filed with insurers in those states resulted in the insurer reversing its coverage denial.

Also, data from a national study on appeals conducted by a trade association for insurance companies showed coverage denials were reversed roughly 40 percent of the time.

Some deficiencies

With such limited data, this doesn't mean you have a double-digit chance your denial will be overturned. In fact, in a letter responding to the denial report, the Department of Health and Human Services said GAO's findings underline the great deficiency in information on insurance denials.

 Still, the GAO report provides helpful information for the nearly 64 percent of people in 2009 who relied on private insurance for health care coverage, most through employer-sponsored group health coverage.

A number of provisions under the Affordable Care Act protect people against the denial of insurance coverage, but until the law is fully implemented, rejections can continue.

For help in dealing with your insurer, try contacting the nonprofit Patient Advocate Foundation (www.patientadvocate.org).

For information about the health care law, go to www.healthcare.gov. If you have a pre-existing medical condition and you are having trouble finding coverage, go to www.pcip.gov. On that site you will find information about the new Pre-Existing Condition Insurance Plan, which was created last year as part of the Affordable Care Act.

Readers can write to Michelle Singletary care of The Washington Post, 1150 15th St., N.W., Washington, DC 20071.

Wisconsin out front on health insurance exchanges

Auto Insurance Quotes ~ Wisconsin out front on health insurance exchanges : WASHINGTON — Wisconsin is at the forefront of an effort to build the information technology system for state health insurance marketplaces, despite Gov. Scott Walker's rejection of the federal health care law.

The Department of Health and Human Services last month awarded Wisconsin $37.7 million for the project. The Badger State was among seven grantees — the others were Kansas, Maryland, New York, Oklahoma, Oregon and a consortium of New England states — selected to receive a chunk of $241 million in "early innovator" grants.

Officials from those states are in Washington for a briefing on the project. The states are required to develop models that can be used in other states.

"Early innovator states will play a critical role in developing a consumer-friendly marketplace where insurers must compete to deliver the best deal," said HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius when announcing the grants on Feb. 16. Sebelius said the grants will lay the groundwork to "ensure consumers in every state will be able to easily navigate their way through health insurance options."

Under the health care law President Barack Obama signed last March, states must establish health insurance exchanges by 2014. The exchanges will allow consumers and small businesses to shop for and enroll in private health care plans that suit their needs.

While states must begin operating the exchanges in 2014, they have to declare their intent to form them by Jan. 1, 2013. The federal government will step in to run the exchanges in states that fail to comply. Wisconsin Department of Health Secretary Dennis Smith said the state is well on its way to fulfilling its commitment.

"Wisconsin has a bit of a head start," Smith said, noting how the state began developing an automated eligibility system for its state-based health insurance programs. "That's one thing that makes this state a leader."

Still, one of the first steps Walker took on his first day in office was to authorize Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen to join 25 other states in a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the health care law. A federal judge has ruled in favor of the states, but the Obama administration has filed an appeal. The case is expected to ultimately be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court, and that could take a while.

"While Gov. Walker strongly opposes ObamaCare and firmly believes it is unconstitutional, Wisconsin still has an obligation to implement the law in a way that best fits our state," said Walker's spokesman, Cullen Werwie. "If a health insurance purchasing exchange is created in Wisconsin, it is crucial that it be uniquely Wisconsin."

Wisconsin is carrying out its exchange responsibility with an emphasis on a free-market approach, Smith said. He said the new administration's focus will be heavy on information and light on regulation.

"Part of what we believe is important with this exchange is to demonstrate that it should not be used in a regulatory manner that would disrupt our competitive market," Smith said.

Wisconsin applied for the innovator grant while former Gov. Jim Doyle was still in office. Awardees were selected based on their technical expertise, their readiness to develop information technology for exchanges, the adaptability of their systems to other states and a demonstration that planning already was under way.

Through the exchange, Wisconsin envisions improving the delivery of affordable care to as many as 160,000 people in the nongroup market, 770,000 BadgerCare Plus and Medicaid clients and 1 million small-business employees, according to a description of the project.

"Wisconsin's proposal envisions a single, intuitive portal through which residents can access subsidized and nonsubsidized health care and other state-based programs," HHS said in a statement announcing the grant awards. "The exchange will integrate across health and human services programs to promote efficiency and lower overall administrative cost."

Smith said while state officials are ahead of schedule in creating its exchange, some major challenges remain. He said the state has yet to hear from federal officials about how to build in tax subsidies and credits and other income information necessary to determine eligibility.

"The technical challenges are enormous," Smith said. But, he added, "from our perspective we feel very confident about our ability to manage the project."

The exchange effort is being led by the Wisconsin Office of Health Care Reform, which Doyle created to administer the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. In December, the office released a report outlining its vision for the state's insurance marketplace. A prototype can be found at https://exchange.wisconsin.gov.

The nation's major health insurance providers support the exchanges and believe the early-innovator effort is a wise endeavor, said Robert Zirkelbach, a spokesman for America's Health Insurance Plans, which represents nearly 1,300 insurers. But providers want to ensure that the exchanges are done right, Zirkelbach added, so that choice and competition are maximized.

"We strongly support the concept to provide one-stop shopping so people can search for a plan that's right for them," Zirkelbach said. "These early-innovator grants are a good way to see what models work best and prevent each state from having to reinvent the wheel."

A shift toward smaller health insurance networks

Auto Insurance Quotes ~ A shift toward smaller health insurance networks : Thousands of employers in California and nationwide are opting for 'narrow network' HMOs, which offer notable savings on insurance premiums but also offer fewer medical providers.

Thousands of employers in California and across the country are slashing expensive doctors and hospitals from their insurance rosters in a move to hold down rising healthcare costs — a trend that is gaining favor with corporate bosses, if not the rank and file.

The savings on insurance premiums — nearly 25% in some cases — are gained when companies switch their health plans to "narrow network" HMOs that offer fewer choices of medical providers.

California, with nearly 21 million people in health maintenance organizations, is driving the rapid expansion of these networks. More than 10,000 California employers and public agencies have enrolled, mostly since the recession struck in 2008.

While many workers welcome the cheaper HMOs, the savings come at the price of fewer healthcare choices.

Beverly Prange chose a slimmed-down network in January offered through her employer, the San Diego County Office of Education. The change cut her insurance premiums but meant switching physicians, something she was reluctant to do.

"I have less flexibility now than I had in the past," said Prange, a migrant education specialist. "I liked the doctor where I was."

The narrow networks have attracted some of California's largest employers. Two of the biggest users — the University of California and the California Public Employees' Retirement System — have offered their members the option of slimmer plans sold by Health Net Inc. and Blue Shield of California, and say the cost-cutting alternatives have found wide acceptance.

"It's a better use of healthcare dollars for our members," said Kathleen Billingsley, a CalPERS benefits official.

Insurers and employer groups say the networks have grown fastest among small businesses, allowing them to save money and still get high-quality medical care for their employees.

California Furniture Galleries, a small home furnishings store in Canoga Park, chose the "Silver" network from Health Net last year rather than asking 14 employees to pay more for their health insurance. The change roughly cut in half an expected 13% increase in premiums, and most employees were able to keep their doctors, who were part of the smaller network.

"It was a no-brainer," manager Mike Katz said of the decision to switch.

The availability of doctors varies by each narrow network. Woodland Hills-based Health Net, one of the first to promote the strategy in California, features 47,000 doctors in its full HMO network but just 7,000 physicians in its Silver plan.

That network — available in 10 counties, including Los Angeles, Orange, San Bernardino and Riverside — can save businesses as much as 14% on insurance premiums, a spokesman said.

An even smaller network, Bronze, has 1,600 doctors in Los Angeles, San Diego and San Bernardino counties, and can shave as much as 24% off insurance bills.

"We know we have a popular, growing concept," said Health Net spokesman Brad Kieffer, who noted the company's plans to expand beyond California.

Other insurance companies, seeing a trend in the making, are eagerly promoting their own versions of narrow networks nationwide. Three of the largest national providers in particular — WellPoint Inc., Aetna Inc. and UnitedHealth Group Inc. — are quickly expanding the niche to capture millions of new customers.

UnitedHealthcare alone has signed up about 75,000 employer groups nationwide, the bulk of them in the last two years, including more than two dozen Southern California school districts that joined in January.

"We are revving up that engine," said Dr. Sam Ho, UnitedHealthcare's chief medical officer. "There is an aggressive appetite for new solutions and new opportunities to manage healthcare costs."

California regulators said consumers were protected from potential abuses by a state law that requires narrow networks to abide by the same rules set for broader HMO systems — for example, providing access to doctors and hospitals close to patients' homes.

Healthcare experts and consumer advocates warn that eliminating doctors and hospitals from insurance lists could harm patients, particularly those who depend on specific providers to treat chronic or life-threatening conditions.

They note that HMO patients who seek care from doctors outside their networks typically must foot the entire cost of their treatments.

"The real question is, can people who are really sick and need high-end specialty care … still get the care they need in these narrower networks?" asked Drew Altman, president of the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonprofit research organization in Northern California. "That will depend on the details of how they work."

Insurers say they have designed the smaller networks with healthcare quality in mind, relying on clinical benchmarks from outside organizations to ensure that customers receive high-quality care.

In California, for instance, insurers say they often look to the state's Office of the Patient Advocate for quality guidelines. Every year, the state agency issues a report card on HMOs to help consumers evaluate health coverage.

Insurers also say these narrow networks don't dramatically cut people's choices, and that the slimmed-down lists of doctors and hospitals often feature many of the providers in the broader HMO systems.

That's what Tony Sarabia found when his clerical services company switched to Health Net's Silver network last year. The Rolling Hills Estate firm saw a slight decrease in its insurance bill, while its four employees got to keep their primary-care doctors.

"That gave us some peace of mind," Sarabia said. "It certainly makes it a lot easier to keep up with our commitment to our employees to provide coverage."

But Craig Madore, a partner in a Los Angeles media company, was alarmed after he switched to a narrow network offered by Anthem Blue Cross and discovered that his longtime doctor was not included.

Madore immediately called his insurance broker and found that his physician belonged to Anthem's broader HMO network. He switched within days. The change drove up his insurance bill by nearly $800 a year, but he said he was more than willing to pay the extra cost.

"I love my doctor," said Madore, 42. "He listens. He's compassionate. He's my partner when I make healthcare decisions."

Operating profit from Minn. health insurance programs increased by 1/3 in 2010

Auto Insurance Quotes ~ Operating profit from Minn. health insurance programs increased by 1/3 in 2010 : ST. PAUL, Minn. — Operating profit from Minnesota health insurance programs for low-income residents increased by about one-third in 2010.

According to the Minnesota Council of Health Plans, a trade group for the HMOs, operating income from the state health programs came in at $130.8 million last year, up from $98.7 million in 2009.

The St. Paul Pioneer Press reports the numbers push surpluses for HMOs and related insurance subsidiaries in the state to $2.5 billion.

Legislators and Gov. Mark Dayton are looking at the health plans as piggy banks as they try to resolve the state's $5 billion budget deficit.

One HMO, Minneapolis-based UCare, said last month it would give back $30 million to the state in light of strong 2010 results. Dayton has asked others to follow suit.

Is the Affordable Care Act constitutional? The score is 3 to 2

Auto Insurance Quotes ~ Is the Affordable Care Act constitutional? The score is 3 to 2 : Three Democratic U.S. district judges ruled that the Affordable Care Act's mandate requiring individuals to buy at least a minimum amount of health insurance is constitutional. Two Republican U.S. district judges declared the mandate unconstitutional. Several more district court cases are pending. It appears the judgments are a matter of political perspective.

Four of the judges limited their decisions principally to the constitutionality of the mandate. However, in a suit filed by 26 states, Florida Judge Roger Vinson ruled the entire act unconstitutional because the individual mandate was "inextricably bound together" with the remainder of the act's provisions.

He bolstered his opinion on the Obama administration's very argument that the ACA is constitutional because the mandate is absolutely essential to achieving the ACA's other provisions for reforming the health-insurance market.

Examples of other provisions include the prohibition against canceling an insurance policy based on health status or rejecting people with pre-existing conditions. Everyone is correct. Without the mandate, the ACA falls apart; providing health coverage to all Americans would be impossible.

Here is the major constitutional question: Unquestionably, Congress has the power to regulate the insurance industry. But did Congress exceed its authority to regulate interstate commerce granted by the Constitution's Commerce Clause by mandating individuals to buy health insurance or pay a penalty? Or more particularly, can Congress penalize individuals for not buying health insurance? That would entail people being penalized for "inaction" rather than an "action"; that is, penalized for not engaging in commerce.

Universal enrollment spreads the financing of health insurance over the entire population. It also eliminates adverse selection, and interrupts the cost-shifting of medical expenses of the uninsured, who are apt to receive care at no cost, to the insured, hospitals and physicians. Cost-shifting increases the price of medical services and causes premiums to rise.

This is also why the mandate is essential for providing health coverage to all Americans.

In fact, although generous subsidies were already available, the individual mandate in Massachusetts proved to be imperative in bringing the healthy uninsured into its state program.

To be constitutional, however, the mandate must also be essential for the ACA to substantially redesign the insurance industry and rise to the stature of a "broader regulatory scheme." Indeed, the mandate is necessary and the ACA meets this standard.

This legal matter will probably find its way to the Supreme Court, especially if appellate courts offer conflicting opinions. The court may also consider the question of whether health care is a unique situation in which people can be required to buy something (but not serve as precedent for other situations). Apparently, issues of personal liberty and requiring states to expand Medicaid are not constitutional issues in question.

But here's the irony of the Republican push to overturn the ACA on the constitutionality of the individual mandate: The ACA was created to both rescue the country from an unsustainable health-care system and preserve the private health-insurance industry. If the individual mandate is necessary to expand health coverage to all but is determined to be unconstitutional, then the only alternative would be what Republicans loathe -- a single-payer system.

There are no constitutional issues regarding a government-benefit program funded by taxes. It's been called "Medicare for all."

OK, understanding that some will say that Dr. Feldman should stick to medical issues, here's my humble opinion:

The individual mandate is constitutional. Congress concluded, with rational justification, that individual decisions regarding the purchase of health insurance profoundly affect the insurance marketplace, thus substantially affecting interstate commerce. Since everyone will eventually require medical care, the "inaction" of not procuring health insurance is actually an "action" that financially affects others.

Pensions, health insurance targeted

Pensions, health insurance targeted

 

Pensions, health insurance targeted: Members of the new Republican majority in the Alabama Legislature may be wondering just why they wanted the job as they struggle to keep government running with far less revenue than in past years.When lawmakers start their session on Tuesday, a focus will be on producing balanced budgets despite declining revenues.

One thing is certain about the budget year that begins Oct. 1 -- it's not likely to be remembered fondly by state employees and public school teachers. Some likely will face layoffs, and others could see their workdays reduced. The governor even mentioned possibly reducing the number of state holidays.

But state employees and teachers should brace themselves for something else -- their health insurance and pensions also are likely to be put under a microscope as the governor and the Legislature try to find ways to save money.

Gov. Robert Bentley said Friday that in writing the budgets, he and the lawmakers are likely to "ask employees to pay more" for their health insurance and pensions.

States across the nation are struggling to curb rising pension and health insurance costs. The trend in Alabama is disturbing.

For instance, Finance Director David Perry said Friday that pensions and health insurance accounted for about 6.75 percent of the General Fund budget in 2000. By 2005, that had climbed to about 8.5 percent. By 2010, pensions and health insurance for state employees were eating up about 12 percent of the General Fund budget.

"That is unsustainable over time," Perry said, saying a similar pattern could be found in the education budgets.

The governor and the budget director said there are a variety of approaches being discussed to control pensions and health insurance costs. Both emphasized that no firm decisions had been made on whether any or all of them will be proposed in legislation.

Among the possible approaches are:

# Providing no more than level funding, or possibly less than level funding, for the state portion of health insurance costs. That would leave it up to the managing boards of the state employees and teachers health insurance plans to make up the difference, either through cuts in coverage or higher employee contributions.

read more: http://www.montgomeryadvertiser.com/article/20110227/OPINION01/102270314/1006/OPINION

International Health Insurance

International Health Insurance

 

International health insurance is a good option for many people traveling internationally, because many medical insurance plans do not provide coverage outside of their national area. Prior to purchasing an international health insurance policy, check with your health insurance provider to confirm that your current coverage will not cover international healthcare costs. If your policy does provide coverage, you should confirm how your benefit caps and deductibles will apply to international travel. If your current medical coverage does not provide for international travel, then you should consider purchasing a supplemental, short-term policy for your trip.

There are many short-term health insurance policies that can cover international travel. This additional coverage is supplemental and often covers what a primary insurance policy does not cover. Many of these policies are available for purchase from travel agents or private companies, and they can provide coverage of all medical expenses incurred overseas, including emergency services, preventative care and medical evaluation depending on the type of policy.

Many private companies offer short-term international policies and will base the premium amount on the duration of their trip and the type of coverage needed. Additionally, many preexisting medical conditions are covered under travel medical insurance, depending on recently the traveler has been treated for that condition. Consumers should check their international health insurance policy to be sure that it covers such conditions prior to purchase. Also, consumers who travel internationally quite often might want to consider purchasing an annual international health insurance policy to save money. These policies could save significant money if someone travels internationally more than three times per year.

For students traveling abroad, student travel insurance might be good option. Many schools or organized student programs provide this type of international health insurance for a small fee. This policy often only covers emergency medical expenses, however, and would not cover preventative care or medical evaluations.

When shopping for international health insurance, travelers should carefully compare policies, prices and providers to be sure they are purchasing the adequate coverage for their healthcare needs. Also, some countries require that travelers purchase local insurance or that the insurance company providing international coverage is authorized to be used in their country. Prior to purchasing any short-term policy, consumers should check each host country's health insurance requirements. Additionally, travelers who are visiting an at-risk country should confirm that their medical insurance will be honored in that country.

Health Insurance Kicks In for Congress

Health Insurance Kicks In for Congress

 

Government-subsidized health insurance – one of many perks of serving in Congress – kicked in on Tuesday for new members.

But a group of more than a dozen freshman Republicans who campaigned vigorously on overturning President Obama’s new health care law will be opting out.

Whether in direct protest of the health care overhaul, which House Republicans voted unanimously to repeal two weeks ago, or in an attempt to retain their Washington-outsider patina, about 15 members declined coverage through the Federal Employees’ Health Benefits Plan, which covers eight million federal employees and their dependents.

Among them were: Representatives Joe Walsh, Republican of Illinois, Richard Nugent of Florida, and Paul Gosar of Arizona, who was a dentist for 25 years and sold his practice to pursue politics.

The federal health care program, established in 1960, gives federal workers a variety of plans to choose from and in this respect, its structure is somewhat similar to that of the health insurance exchanges set to begin in 2014 under the new law.

For months, Democrats have challenged Republican members to forgo their federal insurance to show they are serious about dismantling the legislation. Some Republicans have countered that accepting coverage from the taxpayer-sponsored program makes them just like millions of private citizens who participate in the health insurance offered by their employers.

The symbolism of the decision to opt out of government coverage had drawn Democrats to that choice in the past, for the opposite reason.

Senator Sherrod Brown of Ohio and Representative Joe Courtney of Connecticut, both Democrats, pledged to decline federal health insurance until all Americans have access to health care.

After 18 years on Capitol Hill Mr. Brown, elected in 1992, finally enrolled last year after the new health care law was passed. Mr. Courtney, however, apparently doesn’t think it’s a done deal.

Court Ruling Escalates Right-Wing Attack on Health Care Reform

Court Ruling Escalates Right-Wing Attack on Health Care Reform

 


The Republicans have tried to sabotage health care reform since it was introduced—disrupting town hall meetings, spreading lies about the legislation (remember death panels?) and now trying to repeal the entire Affordable Care Act. But Republicans have completely failed at defeating a law that extends health coverage to millions of Americans who are uninsured.

Since they can’t win repeal, Republicans have resorted to trying to dismantle the law piece by piece. They’ve held symbolic repeal votes and launched lawsuits in 28 different states with Republican governors or attorney generals. The lawsuits focus on ruling small pieces unconstitutional, like the individual mandate, in order to take down the entire law.

The lawsuits won’t reverse the health care reform law all at once, but they do set the stage for a showdown in the Supreme Court, and it keeps Republicans in the spotlight. Just this week, a federal judge in Florida ruled the entire federal health care reform law void on the basis that the individual mandate was unconstitutional.

Why are Republicans throwing such a fit over a law that allows kids with asthma or diabetes to get health care? Why oppose a law that prevents terminally ill cancer patients from being kicked off their insurance? Why dismantle reform that puts money in the pockets of seniors for their prescription drugs? Why repeal a move to make sure no one has to mortgage their home or file bankruptcy if they get sick or injured?

Why fight a law that lowers the cost of health care? Oh wait a minute….health insurance companies don’t really like that part of it. A newly released study by the Health and Human Services Agency finds that the federal health care reform will drive down the cost of premiums. By just 2014 families could save as much as $2300 on premiums because of health care reform, and low-income families could save $9900. A key driver of cost savings in the state-based Exchanges where people can shop for insurance and get federal subsidies to pay for coverage.

Health insurance companies have made out like bandits under the pre-reform system. Last year, the profits of the five largest health insurers saw their profits increase by 56 percent. One of those big five companies, WellPoint, is the parent of Anthem Blue Cross, which tried to jack up premiums for customers by 39 percent in California last year, though they backed off the increase after errors were found in their calculations. So it’s not surprising that they and their Republican allies would fight to repeal a law that would curtail insurer ability to raise rates and double their profits in a year.

Despite attempts by Republicans to repeal the federal law, California is racing ahead to implement health care reform, and in many cases improve it. We were the first state in the nation to set up a Health Benefits Exchange that could be a model for other states. And millions of Californians have already reaped the benefits of reform—such as keeping their 19-26 year old kids on their coverage or knowing that their child won’t be denied insurance because of a pre-existing condition.

As in the 2010 elections, California is beating back the red tide of Republican rollbacks and is forging ahead with critical reforms to our health care system.
source: Auto insurance quotes, Get auto insurance quotes, Compare auto insurance, Auto insurance comparisons, Auto insurance quote, Instant auto insurance, Affordable auto insurance, Auto insurance companies, Auto insurance rates, Auto insurance discounts, Auto car insurance, Student auto insurance, Auto insurance brokers, General auto insurance, American auto insurance, Auto insurance UK, Auto insurance claims, Fake auto insurance, Auto insurance complaints

High Cost of Medical Care in Singapore

High Cost of Medical Care in Singapore

 

Leong Sze Hian recently wrote a letter to the Straits Times forum asking about the large jump in the size of class “C” hospital bills [Link]. In my blog, I’ve highlight numerous cases of families (that are not rich) shouldering enormous healthcare burden due to either cracks or inadequacies in the system. In the past 4 years, class “C” bills have nearly doubled and this escalating cost hit the sick and their family really hard. The latest case being that of Olympic hero Tan Howe Liang’s wife who had breast cancer [see article below]- fortunately an anonymous donor came the family’s rescue.

The MOH’s reply to Leong Sze Hian generated by its PR (Corporate Communications) dept dismisses his concerns without addressing the real issue.

3 Questions to Ask If Your Family Can't Afford Health Insurance

3 Questions to Ask If Your Family Can't Afford Health Insurance 

 

In an effort to help quell the fears of families worried about losing their health insurance coverage after one or both heads-of-household have lost their jobs, the Foundation for Health Coverage Education (FHCE), www.CoverageForAll.org, urges families to ask themselves three questions. This strategy, put together by the FHCE's counselors who answer phones at the 24/7 U.S. Uninsured Help Line (800-234-1317), can help families identify possible safety net options that could allow them to hold onto their current coverage or discover possible public-sponsored health coverage programs available to them. The three questions are as follows.

1. Do We Qualify for Family Gap Coverage? 
"When a family's income drops, often overlooked is the fact that their new income level may make them eligible for low-cost or no-cost public coverage options," suggests Phil Lebherz, Founder and Executive Director of the FHCE. "In some states, such as New York and New Hampshire, a family of four can make up to $88,000 a year and still qualify for low-cost government health coverage for their children." In addition, all 50 states offer Medicaid coverage to adults who qualify at lower income levels. The FHCE has organized all of these public programs state-by-state on its website, www.CoverageForAll.org, and offers a simplified 5-question Eligibility Quiz for families to receive a personalized list of both the public and private options for which they may qualify.

2. Can Becoming a Small Business Help Us? 
The FHCE often encourages laid-off individuals, who are consulting or who have started a small enterprise, to apply for health coverage as a small business. In all 50 states, businesses with one or two employees can seek group health coverage, taking advantage of protections offered only to employers. Under group coverage, individuals with pre-existing conditions cannot be denied coverage. Although group coverage rates can be more expensive, a small business can take advantage of new tax credits which make coverage more affordable. Tax credits of up to 35 percent of premiums will be available to small businesses with 25 employees or less for tax years 2010-2013, as long as the employer contributes at least 50% of the premium.

3. Can High Risk Pools Help Us? 
For those who have pre-existing medical conditions and have been turned down by private insurers, the Pre-Existing Condition Insurance Plan (PCIP), a tenet of health care reform, is now offered in every state and covers a broad range of health benefits. One drawback with the federal program, however, is the requirement that an individual be without health insurance for six months in order to qualify. More than 30 states had high risk pools available without this 6-month exclusion period prior to the passage of the PPACA. Although the premiums may be higher than the PCIP, the coverage is worth researching if your family has a history of pre-existing conditions.

Individuals and families with questions about their health coverage options can visit CoverageForAll.org and take a simple 5-Question Eligibility Quiz or call the 24/7 multi-lingual U.S. Uninsured Help Line 800-234-1317 to talk with a health insurance counselor who will review the questions with them. In addition to its toll-free U.S. Uninsured Help Line and CoverageForAll.org, FHCE offers free downloadable consumer guides, such as the Health Care Options Matrix, for all 50 states.
The Foundation for Health Coverage Education (FHCE) is a 501 (c)3 non-profit organization with a mission to help simplify public and private health insurance eligibility information in order for more people to access coverage.

Hospitals join to offer better liability insurance

Hospitals join to offer better liability insurance

 


LACONIA — LRGHealthcare has joined with three other hospital systems to form Granite Shield Insurance Exchange, a reciprocal captive insurance company licensed in Vermont, which will insure the institutions and their employees against general and professional liability.

LRGH's partners are Concord Hospital, Eliot Health Systems of Manchester and Wentworth-Douglass Hospital of Dover. The hospitals invested equity capital in the enterprise and will pay annual premiums based their claims experience and risk exposure.

Granite Shield will provide both primary coverage and excess insurance for the hospitals as well as physicians, nurses, administrators and support staff. Captive insurance companies are established by parent firms or groups as subsidiaries to underwrite the risks associated with their operations. They are "captive" in the sense that the policyholders own their insurance carrier.

Granite Shield Insurance Exchange is among 911 captive insurance companies domiciled in Vermont, the most of any state and exceed only by Bermuda and the Cayman Islands. Dan Towle, director of financial service in Vermont, said that captive insurance companies formed by health care corporations are among the fastest growing sectors of the industry.

With the establishment of Granite Shield, LRGH ended its longstanding relationship with the New Hampshire Medical Malpractice Joint Underwriting Association (JUA). With annual premiums of more than $1-million, LRGH was the only hospital and largest policyholder of the JUA. LRGH led the coalition of policyholders that successfully challenged the effort of Governor John Lynch and his administration to transfer the JUA's surplus of $110-million to the general fund in order to balance the state budget.

Mitchell Jean, director of risk management at LRGH, stressed that the decision to leave the JUA for Granite Shield had "absolutely nothing to do with our experience with the JUA. I loved working with them," he continued. "They had great claim and underwriting services."

Instead, Granite Shield represents the first fruit of more than a year of growing collaboration between the four hospitals, along with the Southern New Hampshire Medical Center of Nashua. Henry Lipman, executive vice-president and chief financial officer of LRGH, said that because proliferation of medical sub-specialities require large population bases, hospitals have forged clinical relationships. For example, LRGH shares cardiology services with Concord Hospital and oncology services with several hospitals.

In anticipation of federal health care reform, the four hospitals began exploring ways to leverage their aggregate resources to enhance the quality of services and achieve operating efficiencies while maintaining their independent identities.

The hospitals engaged Marsh Risk Consulting, which after a comprehensive actuarial study recommended the group form a captive insurance company. Marsh will administer Granite Shield and another national firm specializing in malpractice will be contracted to manage claims.

Jean explained that Granite Shield provides its members with a framework for a collaborative approach to risk management. "We are working with our counterparts to reduce risk by introducing best practices throughout both Lakes Region General Hospital and Franklin General Hospital," he said. Risk managers from the member hospitals meet monthly, he said, often joined by clinical risk managers, who at LRGH are led by chief of staff Dr. Peter Walkley.

Walkley offered "CPOM" ¿ computerized physician order management ¿ as an example of minimizing risk in a clinical setting.

Traditionally a doctor wrote an order on a patient's chart, which was then transcribed, entered into a system and executed by nursing staff. "At each point of transmission, there is a risk of error," he said, "if only from handwriting." With "CPOM," orders are transmitted by computers, which check for inconsistencies, such as prescribing incompatible medications. "It's all about not harming patients," Walkley said.

"The quality of care and the safety of patients has always been our highest priority," Jean said. "We are just as committed to quality and safety today as yesterday." At the same time, he said that closer collaboration promises to strengthen and improve risk management practices, which with a common insurance carrier will be rewarded with lower insurance costs.

Lipman estimated the corporation will trim its annual premiums between $600,000 and $700,000 and actuaries project that aggressive risk management and sound claims experience will ultimately yield refunds in addition to savings.

Singapore Health Insurance

Singapore Health Insurance

 
  •  Professional Service you can trust

    We cannot offer health insurance to Singaporean nationals, or expatriates living in Singapore. For international customers outside of Singapore we can offer a broad range of international health insurance products that will provide comprehensive coverage in Asia and around the world. Plans that we can offer will usually have a number of benefits that a policyholder is able to tailor to suit their specific requirements. With coverage options including out-patient, dental, maternity, and emergency evacuation, you will be assured of receiving the highest levels of quality treatment anywhere in the world.
  • Singapore Health Insurance & Healthcare

    Singapore enjoys very a high quality of healthcare, with some of the finest healthcare providers in the world and a finely balanced financing system that is comprised of mandatory payroll deductions, a national catastrophic health insurance plan as well as government subsidies, and the regulation of healthcare supply and prices.
    The Singapore healthcare system falls under the responsibility of Singapore’s Ministry of Health, and while much of the task of financing the healthcare falls under the auspices of Singapore’s public sector, there is an abundance of private healthcare providers present in the country. Much of the primary healthcare administered in the country is done by private practitioners, who provide up to 80% of primary healthcare services to the Singaporean populace.
    Hospitals in Singapore are renowned for their high quality of care and modernity. The country has 13 private hospitals as well as 7 public, government run hospitals and a number of polyclinics and health centers focusing on a variety of medical specialties. Public hospitals offer affordable, high quality medical services, which are available to every Singaporean resident. The Singaporean government provides hefty subsidies for patients in acute public hospital wards, although the level of subsidy may be determined by the ward they stay in, as well as their income level, as the Singaporean Government instituted means testing for some patients in January 2009. Foreigners are unable to avail themselves of these subsidies, and may face a marked up price for services in public hospitals.
    The private hospitals in Singapore are renowned centers of medical excellence, and are markedly more expensive than the government-run public hospitals. While they will be able to provide you with comprehensive medical services, the out-of-pocket costs put private hospitals out of the reach of those who do not have health insurance in Singapore, as the government does not provide subsidies for their use.
    Singaporean residents, including both Singaporean nationals and international expatriates, are required to contribute a portion of their monthly salary into the Central Provident Fund (CPF), a comprehensive social security savings plan. The monthly payroll deduction is split between three accounts for the resident; the Ordinary Account, the Special Account and the Medisave account. Employers are also required to make monthly contributions to their employees’ CPF accounts.
    The savings accrued in the Ordinary Account can be used to buy a house, as well as paying for education, and approved CPF insurance and investments. The Special Account is reserved for retirement savings as well as investments in financial products related to retirement. The Medisave Account, into which an employee can expect to contribute 6.5-9 percent of their monthly paycheck, can be used to cover hospitalization related expenses, including some out-patient work including chemotherapy and radiotherapy as well as paying for Medishield premiums or Singapore medical insurance.
    Medishield is the national catastrophic Singapore health insurance program, which provides Singaporeans a low cost method of pooling risk. It is designed to help protect against the costs of lengthy hospitalizations and serious illnesses, including selected out-patient treatments such as kidney dialysis or chemotherapy. Singaporean residents may also avail themselves of Medisheild plus, which offers increased coverage options, or Integrated Shield Plans which Singapore health insurance plans run by private medical insurance companies, both of which can be paid for through Medisave Accounts.
    Since many expatriates enter Singapore working for large companies, they will often be extended some kind of medical insurance in Singapore through their companies. If this is the case for you, and details have not been provided to you already, it is advisable to speak with the human resources department about your Singapore health insurance options. Additionally, many expatriate residents may wish to purchase their own Singapore expatriate health insurance policy to cover themselves and their families for access to Singapore’s private medical centers of excellence, which can be costly.
  • Singapore Travel Tips

    Drugs should be avoided at all costs; possession of even a small amount can lead to prison and/or a death sentence. Smoking, littering, jay walking, and eating or drinking on public transportation can result in large fines.
    While Singapore is a safe city, you should be aware of a global terrorist alert and take the necessary precautions. There have been serious terrorist attacks in South East Asia over the last few years and travelers or foreigners living in that area should be aware of the risks, whenever they travel.
    Violent crime in Singapore is rare. Most crimes consist of petty theft (bag snatching and pick pocketing). Foreign nationals should leave their valuables in the hotel safe or with their hosts.
    Offences that are described as “outrages of modesty” (graffiti, inappropriate behavior in social situations) are punishable by whipping.
    Hepatitis, dengue fever, and avian influenza are current health risks in Singapore. The proper precautions should be taken to avoid contracting these diseases. Practice good hygiene, avoid eating food from street vendors, stay away from chicken or poultry farms, and take care to avoid mosquitoes.
    Health care in Singapore is costly. You should take the necessary precautions to avoid incurring costly medical bills.
    Singapore is hot and humid all year round. Keep hydrated and make sure that you wear lots of sunscreen. In the event that you are dehydrated contact the nearest medical facility for immediate help.
  • Additional Singapore Information and Resources

    Unfortunately we cannot provide Singapore Health Insurance products, but if you require any additional information about an international medical insurance plan, please contact us.
    If you are traveling to Singapore, we maintain a comprehensive list of Singapore hospitals/doctors in case you want to brief yourself before your visit to be better prepared in case of emergency. Many of our clients travel internationally so we also maintain a list of Embassies in Singapore.
    If you are interested in keeping abreast of developments in medical insurance in Singapore, please visit our Singapore Insurance News section to find out more.

Massive Irish health insurance rises from state owned Vhi

Massive Irish health insurance rises from state owned Vhi

 


Vhi Healthcare has increased health insurance premiums by up to 45%. This has already caused a customer and political storm of protest. For average family customers it will increase by €331 per annum or €27.60 per month (price of two adults and two children on Parents & Kids) and that the same price increase of 15% will apply to the premiums of 60% of its customers. The price increase will be effective for renewals from February 1, 2011.

Jimmy Tolan of Vhi Healthcare states, “Our customers continue to need to access more healthcare services and we have to set premiums to cover the cost of this. We anticipate that our customers will require 10% more healthcare in 2011 compared to 2010. In addition the recently announced increases in public hospitals of 21% which will increase our healthcare costs by €60 million in 2011 together with further planned increases for 2012 accounted for 8% of the planned price increase.”

Vhi Healthcare will increase the premium for one adult on Plan B by €317 to €1,224 and Plan B Options by €444 to €1,430 from February 1, 2011. This will be an increase of €26 per month for Plan B customers and €37 per month for Plan B Options customers. 29% of Vhi Healthcare’s customers currently have Plan B or Plan B Options. Jimmy Tolan explains, “Vhi Healthcare can no longer afford to make available the very wide range of cover provided by these plans at the previous levels of pricing. Even with the announced price increases this will not prevent us from incurring significant losses in providing the cover under these plans.”

60% of Vhi Healthcare customers will see the cost of their premium increase by 15% when their policy falls due for renewal. The 15% increase will apply to Vhi Healthcare’s Plan A, Parents & Kids, LifeStage Choices and One Plans. The remaining 40% will see premium increases on Plan B /Plan B Excess of 35%, on Plan B Options of 45%, on Plan C of 25%, on Plan D of 21%, and on Plan E of 21%.

To comply with EU rules on insurer solvency, the state-owned insurer is due to be sold, and it will be hard, if not impossible, to sell it as a going concern if it is loss-making. The other alternative is full privatization, but the state of the Irish economy and the banking crisis, may make this difficult. Health insurance is not compulsory in Ireland. All insurers are losing customers who no longer renew, and the latest increases are likely to see the insurer lose younger healthier customers who are no longer prepared to subsidise older unhealthy customers.

Health Insurance Portability, Coming Soon

Health Insurance Portability, Coming Soon

 


Health insurance holders will soon have the choice to switch over to another company under the new portability option being chalked out by the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA). The move is expected to increase quality of services and encourage healthy competition among health
insurance firms.

The norms would be ready by next month.

“Draft guidelines on portability of health insurance policies will be issued by February end,” said J Hari Narayan, chairman, IRDA, on the sidelines a function organised by the Insurance Brokers Association of India.

At present, there is portability facility on motor insurance policies only.

Under the portability option, the financial bonuses, pre-existing disease requirement will also get carry forward, he said.

The guidelines for initial public offerings for life insurance companies will be ready by early February, he added. “Our regulation for IPO of life insurance companies must be ready in two to three weeks.”

Auto Insurance Quotes Compare: 2010 Proved to be a Healthy Year for HHS

Auto Insurance Quotes Compare: 2010 Proved to be a Healthy Year for HHS 

 

The year 2010 was definitely a good one for the health of a lot of Americans, and leading the way to tackle various health problems in the nation was the US Department of Health and Human Services. The government had successfully implemented more stringent marketing rules on tobacco Companies, while at the same time food safety was given its due importance as well.

The Affordable Care Act was also taken up this year, which would make it compulsory for Americans to have health insurance by the year 2014.

The Secretary for Health and Human Services, Kathleen Sebelius informed that the recent bills will help the government in improving public health and the past year had appositive impact on the health of Americans. She said that she was proud of the latest achievements and also commended the efforts that had been pitched in by people working for the departments.

Auto Insurance Quotes Compare: Send health-care law to high court

Auto Insurance Quotes Compare: Send health-care law to high court

 


At some point, the U.S. Supreme Court will likely be asked to make the definitive ruling on whether the Affordable Care Act — the health insurance reform package passed last year by Congress — is constitutional. Three federal courts have already ruled on the question with the scorecard right now standing 2-1 in favor of the reform law. But with more than 20 states already preparing cases to challenge the law — and Wisconsin likely to join them — it is a waste of time to have all of these suits go forward one-by-one in federal court.

The next step in these separate cases is the appeals court level, but none of the three suits argued so far has reached this level. It will take months and possibly years for these cases to go through the appeals courts before getting to the Supreme Court. Let's cut to the chase and send the case to the Supreme Court right now. Eric Holder, President Obama's attorney general, holds the key to this by agreeing with the request for an expedited appeal to the Supreme Court. The central point in the rulings so far has been the requirement that everyone must buy health insurance or pay a tax. Two courts have said this part of the law is constitutional, while the latest ruling in early December from a federal judge in Virginia said otherwise.